Atmoswater Research
+1 604-985-3720
  • Home
  • Atmoswater Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Books (HVAC&R)
    • Water-from-Air Book
  • Useful Lists
    • Manufacturers and Suppliers of Atmospheric Water Generators & Water-from-Air Machines
    • Case Studies About Water-from-Air
    • Atmospheric Water Generator or Water-from-Air Machine Market Research Links
    • Projects about Water-from-Air
    • Articles about Water-from-Air >
      • ScienceDaily Article Links
    • Patents about Water-from-Air and Atmospheric Water Generators
    • Water Lexicon
  • Links, FAQ, & Video
    • Drinking-water Industry Organizations Links
    • Map of the Water-from-Air Resource
    • Topic Links for Water-from-Air
    • Trends for Water-from-Air
    • Water Industry News Links
    • Water Organizations Links
    • Water-from-Air FAQ
    • Video about Water-from-Air
  • Scientific & Technical Consulting
    • Consulting Physical Geographer
    • Research Services in Climatology, Geomorphology, Hydrology, and Oceanography
    • Translations of Scientific and Technical Documents (Swedish, French)
    • Projects >
      • Our Projects
      • Atmospheric Water Vapour Processing (AWVP)
    • Publications by Roland Wahlgren >
      • Publications List for Roland Wahlgren
      • GSC 77-1A (Beaufort Sea Sediment Cores)
      • M.A. Thesis (Beaufort Sea Ice-scour Tracks)
      • GSC 79-1B (Beaufort Sea Ice-scour Tracks)
      • Waterlines (Water-from-Air)
      • Water Research (Water-from-Air)
      • Acta Hort. (Water-from-Air)
      • CWWA Conference 2014
    • Load Research (for BC Hydro)
    • Ice-scour tracks (Beaufort Sea)
  • Atmoswater Shop
  • Terms, Conditions, Privacy

PepsiCo mentions atmospheric water generators in recent call for proposals

7/12/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
PepsiCo's recent call for proposals due February 22, 2002.
PepsiCo mentioned AWGs in its recent call for proposals to improve water use efficiency. You may click on the image above to reach the Innoget website with the proposal call.
0 Comments

Status of the water-from-air industry in 2021 from the viewpoint of Global Water Intelligence

18/11/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture of portion of first page of GWI's article titled
To access the article please click on the image above
This interesting article by Global Water Intelligence (GWI) gives their view of the state of the water-from-air industry in July 2021. Drupps AB provided a link to the full article via their website. 
0 Comments

My answers to questions asked in Oct. 20, 2020 Webinar: Introduction to Atmospheric Water

29/10/2020

2 Comments

 
Picture
Participants at this well-attended webinar had lots of questions---too numerous to answer during the Q & A period at the end of the webinar. So the three panelists were asked to reply to a set of questions---the answers were sent recently to the registered attendees. Here are my answers to the set of eight questions assigned to me. They cover a variety of topics. I hope you find the answers interesting and useful.​
  • ​What effect will widespread global atmospheric water use have on the world climate?   
The big picture is the water cycle. Every moment, myriad processes, natural and human-caused, are evaporating and condensing huge amounts of water. Liquid water that humans consume for drinking is only temporarily with-held from the water cycle (hours or days). The atmosphere contains 15.5 million million cubic meters of water according to a 1995 report by the American Geophysical Union. Various natural processes already transport and distribute vast volumes of water vapor and liquid water across Earth. Even if every single human alive in 2050 (using the UN's 2007 projection for a population peak of 9,200 million people) used water from water-from-air machines at the rate of 50 L (0.050 cubic meters) per day, they would consume (temporarily) only 0.003% of the available atmospheric water. This scenario involving the entire human population is unlikely, so it is also unlikely that water-from-air technologies will cause a drier atmosphere in the context of the Earth’s water cycle and natural processes of water transport and distribution.

Water vapor, the gas phase of water, diffuses along pressure gradients to zones of lower water vapor pressure. If a lot of water vapor was condensed into liquid water in a specific region such as a city, water vapor from outside the region would flow in immediately. No net loss of atmospheric water vapor density would be observed in the city.

Water consumed for domestic water requirements does not exit from the water cycle. Within a day or so the liquid water that is used or temporarily with-held from the water cycle would be returned to the environment by evaporating into atmospheric water vapor.

On a clearly bounded terrestrial surface such as a tropical island, atmospheric water vapor processing systems would increase slightly the annual precipitation. Let us say a large-scale AWG array is installed on an island such as Grand Turk (Turks & Caicos Islands). The island has a surface area of 18 square kilometers (1,800 ha). The AWG array produces water from the air at a rate of 75,335 cubic meters annually. This is equivalent to a rainfall of 7,533 mm over one hectare (10,000 square meters). The average annual precipitation of Grand Turk is 604 mm. This value would be enhanced by [7,533 mm/ha/1,800 ha] = 4 mm (or 0.7% annually, an amount less than the natural variability from year to year. The annual total precipitation in the year 2000, for example, was 704 mm.  

To reinforce the fact that long-term human direct impact on atmospheric water is negligible, note that dehumidifiers and air-conditioners dripping condensate have been increasingly used since the 1950s. I used NOAA global specific humidity data (measured in grams of water per kilogram of air) and subtracted the earlier 30-year 1951 to 1980 annual field from the  more recent 39-year 1981 to 2019 field. The resulting map showed several pools of higher specific humidity (+2 g/kg). These are likely related to climate change. Drying of about -2 g/kg is noticeable over the Sahara and Gobi deserts---more likely to be related to climate change than use of HVAC equipment. Over most of Earth specific humidity has been remarkably stable (+/-1 g/kg) for the past seven decades. By the way, I posted the map in the Atmoswater Research blog. Indirect environmental impacts are more likely. These will be related to the materials used in manufacturing AWGs, product life cycle aspects, and so on. Also, AWGs will enable humans to expand their footprint which could increase population density in a region, lead to increased sewage and waste disposal challenges, and increase energy use. 

These analyses indicate widespread global atmospheric water use will not noticeably affect the world climate.

  • How does the cost of atmospheric water compare for a drinking water source as compared to more conventional sources?
In a tropical climate where a chilled-coil AWG produces water at its rated capacity every hour of the year the electrical energy cost of the water will be, on average, about 0.4 kWh per liter (400 kWh per cubic meter; 1.5 kWh per US gal).

More conventional sources of water have these electrical energy costs:
- Surface water, public supply: 0.37 kWh/cubic meter (Young, 2014)
- Groundwater, public supply: 0.48 kWh/cubic meter (Young, 2014)
- Tap water, 0.46 kWh/cubic meter (Gleick & Cooley, 2009)
- Municipal water (S California): 3 kWh/cubic meter (Gleick & Cooley, 2009)
- Seawater Desalination (reverse osmosis): 2.5 to 7 kWh/cubic meter (Gleick & Cooley, 2009)
- Seawater Desalination (reverse osmosis): 2 kWh/cubic meter (Elimelech & Phillip, 2011, p. S1)
- Bottled Water: 519 to 945 kWh/cubic meter [Gleick & Cooley, 2009; thermal energy units were converted to electrical energy units (3:1) to derive these values]

It was interesting to discover that AWGs used in tropical climates are competitive with bottled water. Keep in mind the apparently cheaper conventional sources may not even be available in some water scarce regions. The desalination costs do not include the apparently difficult to monetize costs of harming local ecosystems with brine disposal.

References:
Elimelch, M. & Phillip, W. A. (2011) Supporting Online Material for The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment. Science 333, 712-717.
Gleick, P. H. & Cooley, H. S. (2009). Energy implications of bottled water. Environ. Res. Lett. 4 (2009) 014009 (6pp).
Young, R. (2014). Watts in a Drop of Water: Savings at the Water-Energy Nexus. An American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/watts-in-drops.pdf 

  • Is there any air cleaning value to AWG? 
If the air entering the machine is strictly indoor air, the air filter in the machine may clean the air slightly but AWGs from credible suppliers are not intended to be air cleaners.

  • COST: Do you have a unit cost for AWG on a per gallon basis?
From a typical retail price list, these are the USD unit costs per US gal of water production capacity when the air temperature is 85 F and the relative humidity is 75%:
- AWG rated for 5 gal/day: $300/gal (residential quality)
- AWG rated for 10 gal/day: $420/gal (balance of list is commercial/industrial quality)
- AWG rated for 40 gal/day: $178/gal
- AWG rated for 140 gal/day: $121/gal
- AWG rated for 800 gal/day: $98/gal
- AWG rated for 1800 gal/day: $82/gal

  • What is the lifetime for the equipment?
Comparable equipment is used in air-conditioning. Typical equipment lifetimes range from 10 to 20 years given proper maintenance.

  • What is the lifetime for an ultraviolet lamp?
12 months. The lamp must be changed annually even if it appears to be still working because the output may have decreased below the threshold for reliable inactivation of microbes.

  • Over the 35 years you’ve been studying this sector, there has been a trail of broken dreams with few companies gaining long-term traction. How has the increased prevalence of these systems and recent funding news (like the $50M to Zero Mass Water [now called SOURCE Global]) changed the conversations you’re having? And, from what sectors or geographies are you hearing the greatest interest?
Conversations have not really changed. We are still firmly in the early to late majority phase (this terminology is from a 2018 article by Paul O’Callaghan and others). This stage lasts typically 12 to 16 years. I think this stage started about 2010. So, increased prevalence of systems and the SOURCE Global funding news are just part of this stage of the AWG industry. Sectors and geographies: Oddly, just in the past few days I have seen two references to US Military interest in AWGs. Otherwise, the drinking water supply sector in the United Arab Emirates is a bit of a hot spot for interest this year.
​
  • Mojave Desert nighttime humidity is as high as 50% and daytime is much lower. It would seem as though the richest source of water is at night when the availability of sunlight is least. It would seem battery use is critical. How many kilowatts is required per 1000 gallons of water?
For air with a given water vapor content, the relative humidity value increases when temperature decreases (such as at night) and the relative humidity value decreases when temperature increases (with solar heating during the daytime). Water vapor content (the atmospheric water resource) actually is quite stable from day to night to next day being related to the properties of the air mass enveloping a region.  Modeling a chilled-coil AWG operating in the climate of Las Vegas shows that water production would be unreliable year-round with this type of machine. Therefore, a desiccant AWG should be considered. An AWG having a rotary solid-desiccant dehumidifier would produce water year-round (usually reasonably close to its water production specifications) according to an ASHRAE model. For an off-grid desiccant AWG, having battery power available during the night increases productivity of the system because the atmospheric water capture process can continue 24 hours per day. An off-grid desiccant AWG could use a solar thermal process during daylight hours to heat the desiccant to release water vapor for subsequent condensation into liquid water. Desiccant AWGs can also use an electric heater to reactivate the desiccant.

The energy cost of water produced by a desiccant AWG was estimated two ways (note that kilowatt is a unit of power---the energy unit is kilowatt x hours, kWh, which is power acting over a period of time):

a. Specifications for a line of industrial rotary desiccant dehumidifiers (using electrical energy) manufactured by Hangzhou Peritech Dehumidifying Equipment Co., Ltd. (http://www.desiccantwheeldehumidifier.com/sale-2082217-industrial-rotary-desiccant-dehumidifier-silica-gel-economical-dehumidifier.html). Their 14.4 L/day model produces water using 2.8 kWh/L (10.6 kWh/US gal or 10,600 kWh per 1000 US gal). Their 1,102 L/day model produces water using 1.3 kWh/L (4.9 kWh/US gal or 4,900 kWh per 1000 US gal).

b. Using information in the SOURCE Global (formerly Zero Mass Water) Patent Application US 2018/0043295 A1. The document includes an example of operation in Amman, Jordan at 14:00 on a July day. Airflow is 90 cfm. Relative humidity is 30%. A solar thermal panel with surface area 1.5 square meters provides 700 W (at 50% efficiency) to heat the desiccant to release captured water at the rate of 0.3 L/h. This information can be interpreted three different ways because international consensus is lacking on comparing different energy sources (e.g., solar thermal versus electricity; read more at the American Physical Society Site https://www.aps.org/policy/reports/popa-reports/energy/units.cfm). We need to make this comparison because the Peritech dehumidifiers and all chilled-coil AWGs are energized by electricity.
i. Thermal energy = electrical energy cost of water = (700 W x 1 h)/0.3 L = 2.33 kWh/L; efficiency of solar thermal assumed to be 100% as per OECD/IEA publication guidelines
ii. Equivalent electrical energy cost = 0.76 kWh/L; efficiency of solar thermal assumed to be 33% as per DOE/EIA (USA) publication guidelines
iii. Equivalent electrical energy cost = 1.17 kWh/L; efficiency of solar thermal assumed to be 50% as stated in the patent application

The range of energy costs for the SOURCE Global patent application example is 2.8 kWh/US gal (2,800 kWh per 1000 US gal) to 8.7 kWh/US gal (8,700 kWh per 1000 US gal).
2 Comments

Design notes for atmospheric water generator products

12/8/2020

0 Comments

 
Here are some product design notes applicable to atmospheric water generator products. The notes are based on an interview with Mitch Maiman, Intelligent Product Solutions by William G. Wong of Electronic Design magazine (July 26, 2020).

Essential elements
  • Objective market assessment (problem being solved for user, understanding of criteria inducing customer to buy)
  • Define product requirements (features, functions, cost, and volumes)
  • End product must deliver on a business opportunity

Common design mistakes to avoid
  • Development activities lose sight of product requirements causing project to go off course and miss deadlines
  • Over-designing for the application (increases cost, weight)---scheduling problems result
  • Misunderstanding cost, time, and expertise required for the product design process
  • Not enough reliability testing of the new product

Best process
  • Tailor the design process to the project complexity, regulatory needs, and risk profile of the client

Embrace smart products
  • Incorporate sensors, processing, and wireless communications (but avoid over-design)
  • Smart product design usually needs a team with a wide range of expertise---mechanical, electrical, radio-frequency, embedded systems, and application software.
0 Comments

"Atmospheric Water Harvesting" article in Chemistry World

6/7/2020

0 Comments

 
Image from the Chemistry World article,
Please click on the image to go to the article at the Chemistry World website.
This is an interesting article about the drinking-water-from-air industry. It also includes a section on fog harvesting. Atmoswater Research got a nice mention!
0 Comments

COVID-19 and water-from-air machines

20/3/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture of article in Water Online - Coronavirus And The Water Cycle...
Go to article by clicking on image above
This article is a good overview of the COVID-19 virus in relation to systems processing drinking water and wastewater. Water-from-air machines (atmospheric water generators, AWGs) are, of course, small-scale drinking water systems. Even though the drinking water within the system may be safe, spigot handles and machine surfaces could be contaminated by viruses and bacteria. Machine users should wash their hands before operating the machine. Machine surfaces, spigots, and spigot handles should be sanitized frequently.
For the air-side of water-from-air systems, relevant information is provided at ASHRAE Resources Available to Address COVID-19 Concerns. 
For the water-side of water-from-air systems there are two good sources of information:
  1. The World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Brief titled, Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for COVID-19. 
  2. Water Quality Association Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update 
0 Comments

#Water-from-Air companies founding years

25/2/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
The Water-from-Air Industry is actively growing! This chart is from the data table below tabulating the founding years for Water-from-Air companies [suppliers of Atmospheric Water Generators (AWGs)]. Companies that failed between 1990 and the present are not included. Only those companies with active websites as of today are included. Founding year information is from the company websites or the LinkedIn profiles of the companies or their founders. The two pre-1990 companies were not set up initially as water-from-air equipment suppliers. Companies started in the 2016–2017 peak years were not apparently a direct response to the Water Abundance XPrize competition which ran during 2016–2018. Founding years were not available for 11 of the 73 companies listed below. The last 10 years saw the formation of 37 firms—half of the existing companies. There has been no apparent merger and acquisition activity. Dozens of companies are marketing actively their AWGs. At least two or three dozen units are operating worldwide (see Case Studies page). According to O'Callaghan and others (2018) when "at least 3 companies actively offer versions of the technology; [with] more than 12 full-scale units in operation" this is one signal the industry is in the "Early and Late Majority" stage which can typically last 12 to 16 years. Two other signals stated by O'Callaghan and colleagues are that "Consulting engineers now specify the technology..." and "Efficiencies [are] gained in engineering design and process optimization." 

Reference: O'Callaghan, P. and others (2018). Development and Application of a Model to Study Water Technology Adoption. Water Environment Research, June 2018, 563–574.
Data Table
pre-1990 (2)
  • Francopost Srl, Italy (1961)
  • Yildiz Makina Sanayi Ltd., Turkey (1983)
1991
1992 (1)
  • Yueqing Kemao Electric Co., Ltd, China
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997 (2)
  • Atmoswater Research
  • Excel Water Technology, Inc., Virginia, USA
1998 (2)
  • Shenzhen FND Air & Water Technology Development Co., Ltd., China
  • Water Technologies International, Inc., Florida, USA 
1999
2000
2001 (2)
  • Hendrx, China
  • MSP Technology.com, LLC, Kentucky, USA
2002 (1)
  • Island Sky Corporation, Florida, USA
2003 (4)
  • Air2Water LLC, California, USA
  • Aqua Sciences, Inc., Florida, USA
  • Atlantis Solar and Wind LLC, California, USA
  • Canadian Dew Technologies Inc., British Columbia, Canada​ 
2004 (4)
  • Aquaer Generators S.L., Spain
  • Global Site Solutions Inc., British Columbia, Canada
  • Ray Agua Universal, Spain
  • WaterMaker (India) Pvt. Ltd., India
2005
2006 (2)
  • Air Solar Water & Rain Capture, Washington, USA
  • Air Water™, South Africa 
2007 (1)
  • EuroSport Active World Corp (EAWC) Technologies, Florida, USA
2008 (3)
  • Genaq Technologies S. L., Spain
  • Quest Water Solutions, Inc,, British Columbia, Canada
  • Rainmaker Worldwide Inc., Ontario, Canada
2009 (1)
  • Veragon Srl, Italy
2010 (4)
  • AT Company, Korea
  • AtmoWater Inc. (Ser-Manukyan Family Holdings), USA
  • DewPoint Systems, Hawaii, USA
  • ​SEAS SA, Switzerland
  • Water-gen LTD, Israel
2011 (2)
  • Atmospheric Water Solutions, Florida, USA
  • Infinite Water, Inc., New York, USA
2012 (3)
  • Drinkable Air, Inc., Florida, USA​
  • SunToWater Technologies, LLC, Texas, USA
  • World Environmental Solutions Pty Limited, Australia
2013 (2)
  • Aquavolve, LLC, Massachusetts, USA
  • Vitality Vector, BV, Netherlands​
2014 (4)
  • Atmospheric Water Generator, LLC (Quench Innovations), Florida, USA
  • AWG Contracting, LLC, Texas, USA
  • Skywell Solutions Ltd (Requench), UK
  • Zero Mass Water, Inc., Arizona, USA
2015 (4)
  • FreshWater Solutions, Chile
  • PanLbilt Global, Illinois, USA
  • Water From Air, South Africa
  • Water Generating Systems, LLC, Washington, DC, USA
2016 (6)
  • Akash Ganga (Clean Water Generator Pvt. Ltd.), India
  • Amigoz Innovative Technologies Pvt. Ltd (Aguaer), India
  • Aquacello, South Africa
  • Generation Water Company Limited, Singapore
  • Maithri Aquatech Pvt Limited, India
  • Skysource.org, California, USA
2017 (8)
  • Akvo Atmospheric Water Systems Pvt. Ltd., India
  • Drupps AB, Sweden
  • Jordan's Air 2 Water, Minnesota, USA​​
  • Majik Water, Kenya
  • Talisa Water, South Africa
  • Tsunami Products, Inc., Washington, USA
  • Uravu Labs, India
  • Watergen USA, Florida, USA
2018 (2)
  • Innovative Teknologies, India
  • LiquidSky, India
2019 (1)
  • Agua de Sol, France
Unknown year (11)
  • Aid Water Global, LLC, Texas, USA
  • Air 2 Water Solutions, California, USA
  • Air-O-Water, India
  • Airwaterex Ltd, Cyprus​
  • Ardor Marketing Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • AW International Ltd, Puerto Rico
  • GOODWATER Beteiligungs GmbH, Austria
  • Proficient Machine and Automation, Michigan, USA
  • RainInABox.org (Rocillo Innovative Technologies, Inc.), California, USA
  • Skywell, LLC, California, USA
  • Water World Solution, France
0 Comments

Absorption cooling for atmospheric water generators

13/11/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
This YouTube video by the Dutch foundation, Happy With Water Foundation, reviews several atmospheric water vapour processing methods and then states that an absorption cooling method using solar energy and vacuum tubes with heat pipes reduces the energy cost of water making it relatively more affordable and practical compared to most other options.
0 Comments

Water-from-Air Quick Guide updated July 2018!

1/8/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Water-from-Air Quick Guide
In response to a reader's comments, the July 2018 reprinted second edition incorporates enhanced temperature versus relative humidity psychrometric tables in Chapter 4 with wider temperature ranges (0–55 °C; 32–132 °F) for finding water vapour density, humidity ratio, and dew-point. This makes the tables more useful for cities like Abu Dhabi, Doha, and Dubai.

This reprint also has a revised Appendix 6: Economics of Off-grid Solar PV for WFA. There are two detailed examples in the Appendix. The first example is for a 1.05 kW input power atmospheric water generator using 1-phase electric power. The second example is for a 2.1 kW input power atmospheric water generator using 3-phase electric power.The Appendix presents clear diagrams showing the main components of single-phase and three-phase off-grid solar PV systems. The Appendix concludes by revealing, for each example, the ratio comparing the price of an off-grid solar PV system to the price of the atmospheric water generator.

The Water-from-Air Quick Guide may be purchased from Amazon. 
0 Comments

Using thermoelectric (Peltier) #technology in atmospheric #water generators

13/3/2018

0 Comments

 
​Thermoelectric cooling technology has had wide appeal as an alternative to mechanical refrigeration cooling technology for at least twenty years. Thermoelectric systems avoid the use of hazardous, harmful refrigerants and noisy compressors​. Low coefficient of performance (COP, in the range of 0.9–1.2) is the main problem preventing widespread use of thermoelectric cooling especially for systems requiring large cooling capacities (Riffat & Ma, 2004). A COP of 1.2151, achieved using a multistage thermoelectric module, was considered "remarkable" by Patel and others (2016)  Only smaller capacity niche applications have been commercialized.

There have been several peer-reviewed papers published and patents issued for atmospheric water generators or dehumidifiers using thermoelectric cooling devices which use the Peltier effect. Some information and products have been featured on websites. Each reference below represents a clickable link to more information.

Examples of papers

Atta, R. M. (2011). Solar Water Condensation Using Thermoelectric Coolers. International Journal of Water Resources and Arid Environments, 1(2), 142–145.

Milani, D., Abbas, A., Vassallo, A., Chiesa, M., & Bakri, D. A. (2011). Evaluation of using thermoelectric coolers in a dehumidification system to generate freshwater from ambient air. Chemical Engineering Science 66(12), 2491-2501.

Muñoz-Garcia, M. A., Moreda, G. P., Raga-Arroyo, M. P., and Marin-González, O. (2013). Water harvesting for young trees using Peltier modules powered by photovoltaic solar energy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 93, 60–67.

Nandy, A., Saha, S., Ganguly, S. & Chattopadhyay, S. (2014). A Project on Atmospheric Water Generator with the Concept of Peltier Effect. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 4, 481–486.

Suryaningsih, S. & Nurhilal, O. (2016). Optimal design of an atmospheric water generator (AWG) based on thermo-electric cooler (TEC) for drought in rural area. AIP Conference Proceedings 1712, 030009 (2016); doi: 10.1063/1.4941874

Davidson, K. B., Asiabanpour, B., & Almusaied, Z. (2017). Applying Biomimetic Principles to Thermoelectric Cooling Devices for Water Collection. Environment and Natural Resources Research 7(3), 27–35.

Examples of Patents

Peeters, J. P. and Berkbigler, L. W. 1997. Electronic household plant watering device. United States Patent 5,634,342. [expired, now in public domain]

Wold, K. F. 1997. Plant watering device and method for promoting plant growth. United States Patent 5,601,236. [expired, now in public domain]

Reidy, J. J. 2008. Thermoelectric, High Efficiency, Water Generating Device. United States Patent 7,337,615.

​Waite, R. K. & Neumann, A. (2017). Water production, filtration, and dispensing system. United States Patent 9,731,218 B2.

​

Examples of Websites

The "instructables" website published the article "How to Make a Dehumidifier (Thermoelectric Cooling) in 2016.

Amazon.com sells several models of "thermoelectric portable compact dehumidifiers".
​
​
References

Patel, J., Patel, M., Patel, J., & Modi, H. (2016) Improvement in the COP of Thermoelectric Cooler. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 5(5), 73–76.
​
Riffat, S. B. & Ma, X. (2004) Improving the coefficient of performance of thermoelectric cooling systems: a review. Int. J. Energy Res. 28: 753-768 (DOI:10.1002/er.991)
0 Comments

Atmospheric #water generators—defining the target #market

1/3/2018

2 Comments

 
Picture--world map showing 32 cities with water scarcity
Thirty-two cities that have been identified as likely to run out of sustainable natural water supplies by the Nature Conservancy and the BBC (see text). Click on map to enlarge.
The target market for atmospheric water generators, in the broadest sense, are people in locations with perennial water shortages due to population growth, climate change, and lack of enough sustainable surface or groundwater within a radius of 100 km. The reference for these defining conditions is: Lalasz, R. (2011). New Study: Billions of City Dwellers in Water Shortage by 2050; retrieved from https://blog.nature.org/conservancy/2011/03/28/pnas-billions-city-urban-water-shortage-2050-nature-conservancy/. A study led by the Nature Conservancy defined these conditions. At least 23 cities fit these conditions. From north to south they are: Shenyang, Beijing, Tehran, Haifa, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Lahore, Delhi, Dubai, Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Kolkata, Mexico City, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Manila, Chennai, Bengaluru, Caracas, Lagos, Cotonou, Abidjan, and Johannesburg. Some small tropical islands such as Grand Turk, Turks and Caicos Islands and Sal Island, Cabo Verde also fit these defining conditions. Recent reports such as “The 11 cities most likely to run out of drinking water - like Cape Town” by the BBC (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-42982959; 11 February 2018) suggest that we could add other cities to the Nature Conservancy’s list. From the BBC report here are nine more cities to add to the list of those likely to run out of sustainable natural water supplies: Cape Town, São Paulo, Cairo, Jakarta, Moscow, Istanbul, London, Tokyo, and Miami.Water-from-Air Resource Charts are available for all the highlighted locations mentioned in this post—just click on the location name to go to the relevant page in the Atmoswater Shop. By the way, if you like bargains, the charts for the 23 water-scarce cities listed by the Nature Conservancy are all included in the book, Water-from-Air Quick Guide.
2 Comments

#CaDrought and the Water-from-Air System Hourly Analysis Model

6/3/2014

2 Comments

 
A Water-from-Air System Hourly Analysis Model for San Francisco, California is available as a free download on the Atmoswater Research website. During the prevailing California Drought, seventeen rural communities were identified by the California Department of Public Health as having "drinking water systems at greatest risk". Two of the affected counties, Sonoma and Santa Cruz are adjacent north and south respectively to San Francisco. Therefore, it is interesting to take a tour through the San Francisco hourly analysis model to see what it can tell us about the feasibility of using water-from-air machines (atmospheric water generators) as alternative or additional water resources in drought affected communities in Sonoma and Santa Cruz.
Tour Stop 1
Water-from-Air System Hourly Analysis Model (cover)
Tour Stop 1: Input values include the water-from-air machine's water production rate at a specific combination of temperature and relative humidity. The chilled surface temperature is also used as a model input value. (Click to enlarge)
Tour Stop 2
Daily Water Production
Tour Stop 2: Daily Water Production graph with an interpretation of the modeled result, (Click to enlarge)
Tour Stop 3
Daily Average Water Production by Month
Tour Stop 3: Daily Average Water Production by Month with an interpretation of the modeled result. In a water crisis situation, each person needs 5 L/day of drinking water. Total daily water demand per person to take care of their drinking, cooking, sanitation, and bathing needs is typically 50 L/day. (Click to enlarge)
Tour Stop 4
Hourly Water Production Rate Annual Frequency Distribution
Tour Stop 4: Hourly Production Rate Annual Frequency Distribution with an interpretation of the modeled result. (Click to enlarge)
Tour Stop 5
Output data
Tour Stop 5: With an average daily water production of 703 L/d, one machine could serve 14 people at the 50 L/d level or 140 people at the minimal 5 L/d level of drinking water consumption. Water storage is needed to distribute the annual water production evenly over the year. Several machines can be distributed throughout a region to serve larger populations. Water-from-air is a unique decentralized way of obtaining water. It is not absolutely necessary to think of a central water production hub. The machines can be placed where they are needed.
Tour Stop 6
Core of model
Tour Stop 6: The core of the model with hourly input and output values. (Click to enlarge)
Tour Stop 7
Daily Water Production table excerpt
Tour Stop 7: This is an excerpt from the daily water production table that is generated from the hourly weather data. The hourly air temperature, relative humidity, and air pressure values enabled calculation of the hourly water vapour density (the water resource).
Tour Stop 8
Diurnal Water Production - March 21
Diurnal Water Production - June 21
Diurnal Water Production - Sept 23
Diurnal Water Production - Dec 28
Tour Stop 8: In San Francisco, the diurnal regime of the water-from-air resource is somewhat variable with the seasons. (Click on images to enlarge them)
I hope you found this tour interesting!  The entire model output consists of 120 pages. Becoming familiar with how a water-from-air machine responds with its freshwater production to the hourly weather at a site is a unique experience that really helps make sound decisions about whether or not to use these machines in various drought situations.

The San Francisco model shown here used weather data from 1993 because that was available as a free sample from a weather data vendor. Given the realities of climate change it would be interesting to run the model with 2013 data.

I can run models for key drought locations in California. The price per model run report is [ask for quote] (USD). Please allow up to five business days for delivery as a PDF download.
2 Comments

The #Water-from-Air Resource Chart Explained

5/3/2014

0 Comments

 
The Water-from-Air Resource Chart for Praia, Cape Verde
The Water-fom-Air Resource Chart for Praia, Cape Verde (click to enlarge).
Why use a Water-from-Air Resource Chart? Well, this colourful output from a computer model is a marvelous tool for understanding how well water-from-air machines (atmospheric water generators; AWGs) would perform at your location. "Knowledge is power"--there is value to being well-prepared before talking to equipment suppliers, consultants, or project colleagues.

Let me guide you through this information-packed chart.

  • Local water vapour resource compared to standard conditions: At standard conditions of 26.7° C dry bulb temperature and 60% relative humidity and 1 atmosphere air pressure (sea level) there is 15.3 grams of water vapour in every cubic metre of moist air. The local water vapour density (the resource) may be less, equal, or greater. By using a standard it is possible to compare one location to another, compare one month to another, compare one hour to another, and so on.
  • Elevation is an important input to the model because water vapour density normally decreases with altitude.
  • Latitude and longitude are for reference—usually water vapour density decreases with increasing latitude north or south (moving from the equator to the poles).
  • Monthly average temperatures for the location are obtained from various reliable sources.
  • Monthly average relative humidity values for the location are calculated by the model once it knows the monthly average dew-points.
  • Monthly average air pressures are calculated from the elevation information relative to the standard atmosphere at sea level which is 1.013 bar.
  • Humidity ratio, specific volume, and dry air density are intermediate values the model needs to calculate the average water vapour density in kilograms of moisture per cubic metre of air.
  • The highlighted-in-blue values of water vapour density have the units [g/cubic metre] to make the values easier to read and comprehend. A gram of water is represented by the 1 mL division on graduated cylinder laboratory glassware.
  • Proportion of water vapour density (WVD) at standard temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) = (monthly average water vapour density) / (15.3 g/cubic m); This proportion is also called the index value.
  • Maximum mechanical dehumidification efficiency = [(average water vapour density - 6.8 g/cubic m)/(average water vapour density)] × 100%; Where 6.8 g/cubic m is the water vapour density of air at 5°C and 100% relative humidity at 1 atmosphere pressure—this models air leaving a wetted, unfrozen dehumidifier coil as being warmer than the freezing point of water and containing all the water vapour it can hold at the leaving temperature; The efficiency value is constrained to be less than 100% because in practice the coil temperature is regulated to 5­°C or above to prevent freezing of water onto the coil which causes overload and damage to the machine's compressor(s). An exploration of maximum efficiency for mechanical dehumidifiers is found in an earlier blog post.
  • Index value colours are applied to the index and efficiency values so the chart user can grasp at a glance the seasonal pattern of the water-from-air resource. The colour key and grade wording (excellent, good, fair, poor) for the index values is shown at the right-hand side of the page.
  • The annual index value is the average of the monthly index values. 
  • Chart 1 is a month-by-month graphical display of average values of temperature (dry bulb), dew-point, relative humidity, and efficiency.
  • Chart 2 is a month-by-month graphical display of average values of water vapour density (WVD; left blue columns) relative to the constant (right pink/red columns) standard condition WVD = 15.3 g/cubic metre.
  • An analysis section for the location enables each chart to be a stand-alone document with a concise explanations about standard conditions, the dehumidification process, and efficiency. This section also identifies the location's climate zone and expresses in words how effective a water-from-air machine would be at the site throughout the year.

Charts for many different locations are available from Atmoswater Research. You are welcome to ask me to produce charts for places of interest that are not listed yet.
0 Comments

Article: Water-from-Air Technologies Can Help Solve Drinking #Water Scarcities

13/2/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture: Screen shot of Water Online Article--Water-from-Air Technologies Can Help Solve Drinking Water ScarcitiesClick on image to read the article.
Abstract from my article published February 11, 2014 on Water Online:

Quantifying the water-from-air resource enables targeting selected cities where installing strategically located stand-alone processors of atmospheric water vapor will have the quickest, most beneficial impact for people facing water scarcities.

1 Comment

#Spain #Water-from-Air Resource Charts

6/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Spain location map
Spain location map (with latitude and longitude). Click to enlarge.
"España sufre sequías cada vez más intensas y prolongadas" _["Spain suffers droughts that are increasingly long and prolonged"; Interempresas.net]

Water-from-air Resource (WFAR) Resource Charts are available for five sites in Spain
. These sites represent five climate zones. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from unreliable to excellent depending on site latitude, elevation, distance inland, and season. Please see the charts for details.

The table below ranks the sites from highest to lowest WFAR Annual Index. Water production is poor or unreliable during the winter months. Hourly water production analyses would be useful for better understanding the feasibility of water-from-air system operation at these sites.
Site
Elevation
Climate
(Main climates | Precipitation | Temperature

Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index
Alicante
Bilbao
Lleida
Salamanca
Madrid
31 m
34 m
192 m
790 m
581 m
arid | steppe | cold arid
warm temperate | fully humid | warm summer
warm temperate | fully humid | hot summer
warm temperate | summer dry | warm summer
warm temperate | summer dry | hot summer
0.67
0.57
0.55
0.49
0.47
0 Comments

#Jamaica #Water-from-Air Resource Chart

3/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Jamaica location mapJamaica location map (click to enlarge)
Jamaica has a history of droughts. The most recent was in 2013.

A Water-from-air Resource (WFAR) Resource Chart is available for Kingston, Jamaica
. This site (9 m elevation) is in the equatorial | winter dry climate zone which encompasses the entire island country. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators are consistently excellent.

Please see the chart for details. The Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index = 1.22.

0 Comments

#Egypt #Water-from-Air Resource Charts

3/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Egypt location map
Egypt location map (with latitude and longitude). Click to enlarge.
Important environmental issues in Egypt are water scarcity, pollution of the Nile River, solid waste, and loss of biodiversity (UNEP, 2013, Arab Region Atlas of Our Changing Environment, page xiv). Can water-from-air technology address the water scarcity issue?

Water-from-air Resource (WFAR) Resource Charts are available for three sites in Egypt. These sites represent one climate zone. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from unreliable to excellent depending on site latitude, elevation, distance inland from the Mediterranean Sea, and season. Please see the charts for details.

The table below ranks the sites from highest to lowest WFAR Annual Index. The coastal site of Alexandria is suitable for year-round effective operation of water-from-air systems even though the water-from-air resource grade ranges from poor to excellent. In contrast, Cairo and Aswan will have periods of unreliable operation during the low sun season. Hourly water production analyses would be useful for better understanding the feasibility of water-from-air system operation at these sites.
Site
Elevation
Climate (Main climates | Precipitation | Temperature)
Water-from-air Resource Annual Index
Alexandria
Cairo
Aswan
7 m
74 m
193 m
arid | desert | hot arid
arid | desert | hot arid
arid | desert | hot arid
0.77
0.65
0.37
0 Comments

#Kuwait #Water-from-Air Resource Chart

2/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Kuwait location mapKuwait location map (click to enlarge)
Important environmental issues in Kuwait are water scarcity, groundwater salinity, land degradation, desertification, pollution, and impacts of the Gulf War (UNEP, 2013, Arab Region Atlas of Our Changing Environment). Can water-from-air technology address the water scarcity issue?

A Water-from-air Resource (WFAR) Resource Chart is available for Kuwait City. This site (54 m elevation) is in the arid | desert | hot arid climate zone. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from unreliable to fair.

Please see the chart for details. An hourly water production analysis would be useful for better understanding the feasibility of water-from-air system operation in Kuwait City (Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index = 0.45).

0 Comments

#Algeria #Water-from-Air Resource Charts

2/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Algeria location map
Algeria location map (with latitude and longitude). Click to enlarge.
Important environmental issues in Algeria are desertification, water scarcity, and pollution (UNEP, 2013, Arab Region Atlas of Our Changing Environment, page xiv). Can water-from-air technology address the water scarcity issue?

Water-from-air Resource (WFAR) Resource Charts are available for four sites in Algeria. These sites represent three climate zones. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from unreliable to good depending on site latitude, elevation, distance inland from the Mediterranean Sea, and season. Please see the charts for details.

The table below ranks the sites from highest to lowest WFAR Annual Index. The coastal site of Algiers is suitable for year-round effective operation of water-from-air systems even though the water-from-air resource grade ranges from poor to good. In contrast, Batna, Biskra, and I-n-Salah will have periods of unreliable operation during the low sun season. Hourly water production analyses would be useful for better understanding the feasibility of water-from-air system operation at these sites.
Site
Elevation
Climate
(Main climates | Precipitation | Temperature)

Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index
Algiers
I-n-Salah
Biskra
Batna
24 m
276 m
86 m
1051 m
warm temperate | summer dry | hot summer
arid | desert | hot arid
arid | desert | hot arid
arid | steppe | cold arid
0.69
0.49
0.47
0.43
0 Comments

#Libya #Water-from-Air Resource Charts

31/12/2013

0 Comments

 
Libya location map
Libya location map (with latitude and longitude). Click to enlarge.
Important environmental issues in Libya are water scarcity, arable land availability, desertification, and oil development and pollution (UNEP, 2013, Arab Region Atlas of Our Changing Environment). Can water-from-air technology address the water scarcity issue?

Water-from-air Resource (WFAR) Resource Charts are available for three sites in Libya. These sites represent two climate zones. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from unreliable to excellent depending on site latitude, elevation, distance inland from the Mediterranean Sea, and season. Please see the charts for details.

The table below ranks the sites from highest to lowest WFAR Annual Index. The coastal site of Darnah is suitable for year-round effective operation of water-from-air systems even though the water-from-air resource grade ranges from fair to excellent. In contrast, coastal Tripoli and inland Sabha will have periods of unreliable operation during the low sun season. Hourly water production analyses would be useful for better understanding the feasibility of water-from-air system operation at these sites.

Site
Elevation
Climate
(Main climates | Precipitation | Temperature
)
Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index
Darnah
Tripoli
Sabha
9 m
81 m
440 m
arid | steppe | hot arid
arid | steppe | hot arid
arid | desert | hot arid
0.79
0.69
0.50
0 Comments

#Morocco #Water-from-Air Resource Charts

12/12/2013

0 Comments

 
Morocco location map
Morocco location map (with latitude and longitude). Click to enlarge.
Water-from-Air Resource (WFAR) Charts are available for four sites in Morocco. These sites represent three different climate zones.Operation conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from unreliable to excellent depending on site latitude, elevation, distance from the Atlantic Ocean, and season. Please see the charts for details.

The table below ranks the sites from highest to lowest WFAR Annual Index. The coastal sites of Rabat and Casablanca have a good water-from-air resource allowing year-round effective operation of water-from-air systems.

At the higher elevation inland sites of Marrakech and Aguerdi, the water vapour resource in the low sun season decreases to the point where water-from-air systems will have unreliable water production during some periods. Hourly water production analyses are useful for better understanding the feasibility of water-from-air system operation at the inland cities.

Site
Elevation
Climate
(Main climates | Precipitation | Temperature)
Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index
Casablanca
Rabat
Marrakech
Aguerdi
61 m
74 m
465 m
449 m
warm temperate | summer dry | hot summer
warm temperate | summer dry | hot summer
arid | steppe | hot arid
arid | desert | hot arid
0.78
0.74
0.56
0.55
0 Comments

#Tunisia #Water-from-Air Resource Charts

11/12/2013

0 Comments

 
Tunisia location mapTunisia location map (with lat. and long.).
Water-from-Air Resource (WFAR) Charts are available for four sites in Tunisia. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from "unreliable" to excellent depending on site latitude, elevation, and season. Please see the charts for details.

The table below ranks the sites from highest to lowest WFAR Annual Index.

Although Gabès and Gafsa are in the same climate zone (arid | desert | hot arid), water-from-air systems will perform better in the moister air of coastal Gabès.

The warm temperate climate of Tunis to the north has a more consistent water-from-air resource through the year than does the arid climate of Sfax to the south.

Tunisia's water-from-air resource exhibits considerable seasonal differences. On balance, the country is a reasonable choice for deployment of water-from-air systems.

Site
Elevation
Climate
(Main climates | Precipitation | Temperature)
Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index
Gabès
Tunis
Sfax
Gafsa
4 m
3 m
22 m
313 m
arid | desert |hot arid
warm temperate | summer dry | hot summer
arid | steppe | hot arid
arid | desert |hot arid
0.71
0.71
0.68
0.57
0 Comments

#China #Water-from-Air Resource Charts

9/12/2013

0 Comments

 
China location map
China location map (with latitude and longitude) showing locations which have available water-from-air resource charts (click on image to enlarge).
Water-from-Air Resource (WFAR) Charts are available for seventeen sites in China. Operating conditions by month for atmospheric water generators range from poor to excellent depending on site latitude, elevation, and season. Please see the charts for details.

The table below ranks the sites from highest to lowest WFAR Annual Index. Generally, water-from-air system performance is better at more southerly sites. Performance is better along the coast than further inland.
During the summer months of July and August, when drinking water scarcity is likely to affect people most, water-from-air systems will offer excellent performance except for Hohhot (fair), Taiyuan (good), and Kunming (good).

China appears to be a worthwhile market for drinking-water-from-air technologies. At least three equipment suppliers are based in the country.

Site
Elevation
Climate
(Main climates | Precipitation | Temperature
)

Water-from-Air Resource Annual Index
Guangzhou
Nanning
Chongqing
Nanchang
Chengdu
Hangzhou
Shanghai
Nanjing
Kunming
Xi'an
Qingdao
Jinan
Tianjin
Shijiazhuang
Beijing
Taiyuan
Hohhot
7 m
72 m
350 m
49 m
507 m
42 m
7 m
11 m
1891 m
397 m
77 m
57 m
4 m
84 m
54 m
778 m
1064 m
warm temperate | winter dry | hot summer
warm temperate |fully humid | hot summer
warm temperate | fully humid | hot summer
warm temperate | fully humid | hot summer
warm temperate | winter dry | hot summer
warm temperate | fully humid | hot summer
warm temperate | fully humid | hot summer
warm temperate | fully humid | hot summer
warm temperate | winter dry | warm summer
warm temperate | winter dry | hot summer
warm temperate | winter dry | hot summer
warm temperate | winter dry | hot summer
snow | winter dry | hot summer
warm temperate | winter dry | hot summer
snow | winter dry | hot summer
snow | winter dry | hot summer
arid | steppe | cold arid
0.99
0.99
0.82
0.80
0.70
0.75
0.75
0.71
0.59
0.59
0.57
0.52
0.51
0.50
0.47
0.42
0.30
0 Comments

#Water-from-Air Resource charts backstory

30/9/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture: Measuring water productionMeasuring water production from an AWG in Belize
While helping a client commercialize water-from-air systems, I got frequent questions about how well atmospheric water generators would perform at various locations around the world. A common misconception was that relative humidity values told the whole story. Higher humidity means more water in the air and better water production. Right? Not really!

The water vapour content of the air, sometimes referred to as "absolute humidity", has the proper scientific name "water vapour density" with units of [grams of water vapour per cubic metre of air]. The water vapour density depends on three measures all at the same time: the air's dry bulb temperature, relative humidity, and atmospheric pressure.

Monthly average climate data for air temperature (dry bulb) and relative humidity is fairly easy to obtain for many places. Average air pressure at a location can be estimated knowing the site's altitude above sea level. Using well-known formulas used in the heating, ventilation, air-conditioning field (HVAC) the average monthly water vapour density can be calculated.

Once water vapour density was known, I could use information about the airflow (in units of cfm or cubic feet per minute) through my client's machines to estimate water production of various designs. The focus on water production was fine for a manufacturer and its customers.

Later, as an independent consultant, potentially dealing with end-users of atmospheric water generators having all sorts of different specifications for airflow I decided it was better to focus on the actual water vapour resource to make charts of wider usefulness.To make it easier to compare how good a site is for atmospheric water generators I had the idea of indexing the water vapour density by dividing the density values by the water vapour density 15.3 g/cubic metre which is the density at the standard measurement conditions of 26.7°C air temperature; 60 % relative humidity. When the water-from-air resource monthly index = 1.00, the expected drinking water production rate from an atmospheric water generator (AWG) at the site should be the same as the machine's specified water-from-air production rate. I gave the Water-from-Air Resource (WFAR) annual index grades (Excellent: Index is greater than or equal to 1.00; Good: Index range 0.76 to 0.99; Fair: Index range 0.51 to 0.75; and Poor: Index range is less than or equal to 0.5) and assigned colours to make it easier to interpret the charts.

A lot of information about a site, all relevant to using water-from-air systems is packaged onto the 8.5 inch x 11 inch landscape format of the charts!
  • Geographic coordinates and elevation;
  • Monthly average temperature, humidity, pressure, and dew-point;
  • Monthly average water vapour density;
  • Monthly average maximum mechanical dehumidification efficiency;
  • Graph to visualize how temperature, humidity, dew-point, and efficiency vary together by month;
  • Graph to visualize and compare monthly average water vapour density with water vapour density at standard conditions;
  • Summary of the analysis, identifying the climate zone and expected atmospheric water generator performance for various periods during a year; and
  • Annual index to compare the water-from-air resource between locations
After a bit of experience using the charts my clients discover some of their business stress evaporates! Here's why:
  • They don't have to spend their own time and resources responding to ongoing questions about how good or bad a place is for operating water-from-air systems. This gives just a bit extra time for concentrating on growing their business and profits;
  • Risk reduction by understanding the characteristics of the water-from-air resource at a site. Why alienate their customer by selling them a machine that might only work properly a couple of months of the year at a site? Better to forgo that sale and focus on sites where the machine return on investment is more favourable;
  • The charts make their business more valuable—they become more of an expert at what they do;
  • They find it easier to achieve sales targets because quantitative information, rather than a guesstimate is available; and
  • Surprises are removed with having solid quantitative knowledge about the water-from-air resource at sites.

Picture: Example of a Water-from-Air Resource Chart
Water-from-Air Resource Chart for Praia, Cape Verde (click to enlarge).
0 Comments

Water and running out of #water?

13/9/2013

0 Comments

 
Today, I have a guest post from Walter Wallie Ivison, Director and CEO of World Environmental Solutions, Australia. As usual, Atmoswater Research is not responsible for the contents of external links.
While most of us accept water in a similar way to the air we breathe, water still remains one of the concerns for most of the world's population illustrated by the number of hits on Google these days on ways to get water; 300,000 a month on water from the atmosphere is a good example.  As we continue to pollute our waters, less fresh water is becoming available for us to drink. More rivers, lakes, and underground aquifers are drying up as the years pass. As bodies of water around the world continue to dry up, we’re seeing more drought conditions spread. There are dust storms in places which have never experienced them until now. As time flows, the amount of agricultural land shrinks, and deserts are growing.

Here are some of the signs of an upcoming global water crisis and some links you may be interested in reading.  

#1 It is being projected that by the year 2030, global demand for water will be 40 percent higher than it is today.

#2 Worldwide demand for fresh water tripled during the last century, and is now doubling every 21 years.

#3 According to USAID, one-third of the population of the earth will be facing severe or chronic water shortages by the year 2025.

#4 Of the 60 million people added to the world’s cities every year, the vast majority of them live in impoverished areas that have no sanitation facilities whatsoever.

#5 It is estimated that 75 percent of the surface water in India is now contaminated by human and agricultural waste.

#6 If you can believe it, according to a UN study on sanitation, far more people in India have access to a cell phone than to a toilet.

#7 In the developing world, 90 percent of all wastewater is discharged completely untreated into local rivers, streams or lakes.

#8 Every 8 seconds, somewhere in the world a child dies from drinking dirty water.

#9 Due to a lack of water, Saudi Arabia has given up on trying to grow wheat and will be 100 percent dependent on wheat imports by the year 2016.

#10 In northern China, the water table is dropping one meter every single year because of drought and overpumping.

#11 Incredibly, a new desert the size of Rhode Island is created in China every single year because of drought and overpumping.

#12 In China, 80 percent of all major rivers have become so horribly polluted that they do not support any aquatic life at all at this point.

#13 Collectively, the women of South Africa walk the equivalent of the distance to the moon and back 16 times a day just to get water.

Here at World Environmental Solutions we continue to pursue clean energy and water from the atmosphere. Our ability to make water from a variety of sources free is the cutting edge of this technology exclusive to WES.

Walter Wallie Ivison, Director and CEO World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd. www.wesolutions.com.au
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Roland Wahlgren

    I have been researching and developing drinking-water-from-air technologies since 1984. As a physical geographer, I strive to contribute an accurate, scientific point-of-view to the field.

    Discover previous interesting and informative scientific/technical posts by clicking "<<Previous" at the bottom of each page!

    Buy the
    Drinking-Water-from-Air Technology: Investor's Guide ("WFA 101").


    Archives

    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    August 2016
    June 2016
    March 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    April 2011
    March 2011
    January 2011

    Categories

    All
    Absorption Cooling
    Advertising
    Afghanistan
    Algeria
    American Samoa
    Anguilla
    Arizona
    Aruba
    Atlas
    Atmospheric Water Generator (AWG)
    Australia
    Azores
    Bahrain
    Belize
    Bermuda
    Brazil
    Business
    California
    Canary Islands
    Cape Verde
    Caribbean
    Case Studies
    Cayman Islands
    Chile
    China
    Colombia
    Condensate
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Cyprus
    Desalination
    Design
    Dew Point
    Dew-point
    Dominican Republic
    Drinking Water Industry
    Drought
    Efficiency
    Egypt
    Environmental Impact
    Finance
    Florida
    Gabon
    Ghana
    GHG-IQ
    Global Water Works Connect
    Hong Kong
    Hourly Model
    Humidity Ratio
    India
    Indonesia
    Inventions
    Irrigation
    Israel
    Jamaica
    Jordan
    Kenya
    Kiribati
    Kuwait
    Libya
    Liquid Desiccant
    Load Research
    Malawi
    Malaysia
    Malta
    Mauritius
    Metal Organic Framework
    Metal-organic Framework
    Mexico
    Morocco
    Oklahoma
    Panama
    Patents
    Philippines
    Qatar
    SDG6
    Singapore
    Solar PV
    Spain
    Standard Test Conditions
    Sweden
    Texas
    Thermoelectric (Peltier)
    Tunisia
    Turks And Caicos Islands
    United Arab Emirates
    Venezuela
    Video Presentations
    Water Abundance XPrize
    Water Bottling
    Water Cost
    Water Crisis
    Water From Air
    Water-from-air
    Water Pseudo Science
    Water Quality
    Water Scarcity
    Water Science
    Water Vapor Density
    Wfa Hourly Analysis

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    Follow atmoswater on Twitter
    Tweets by @atmoswater
Copyright 1999–2022, Roland V. Wahlgren, Atmoswater™ Research. Atmoswater™ is a trademark claimed by Roland V. Wahlgren